from unittest.mock import Mock user = Mock() user.name = 'Guido'
You fully specified all attributes and methods it should have, and you pass it into the tested code, but then that code uses an attribute that you don't expect it to use:
user.age # <Mock name='mock.age' id='...'>
Instead of failing with an AttributeError, the mock instead will create a new mock when its unspecified attribute is accessed. To fix it, you can (and should) use the unittest.mock.seal function (introduced in Python 3.7):
from unittest.mock import Mock user = Mock() user.name = 'Guido'
You fully specified all attributes and methods it should have, and you pass it into the tested code, but then that code uses an attribute that you don't expect it to use:
user.age # <Mock name='mock.age' id='...'>
Instead of failing with an AttributeError, the mock instead will create a new mock when its unspecified attribute is accessed. To fix it, you can (and should) use the unittest.mock.seal function (introduced in Python 3.7):
from unittest.mock import seal seal(user)
user.name # 'Guido'
user.occupation # AttributeError: mock.occupation
BY Python etc
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 280
I have no inside knowledge of a potential stock listing of the popular anti-Whatsapp messaging app, Telegram. But I know this much, judging by most people I talk to, especially crypto investors, if Telegram ever went public, people would gobble it up. I know I would. I’m waiting for it. So is Sergei Sergienko, who claims he owns $800,000 of Telegram’s pre-initial coin offering (ICO) tokens. “If Telegram does a SPAC IPO, there would be demand for this issue. It would probably outstrip the interest we saw during the ICO. Why? Because as of right now Telegram looks like a liberal application that can accept anyone - right after WhatsApp and others have turn on the censorship,” he says.
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
