tg-me.com/A3ven8a/35403
Last Update:
كل ابيض جمــيل 🤍
BY ٱفيۧنۨــہ🕊✨
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/sP-lRzOYdAftLN6193BE6HpYDXauiipZJq4TsXjAyr2ZbYaKU9SxDO64QAt55BQgSF8NZuQ8dVJ717LKp7mldYJPB7VkG6MKociIi2XDP9bLBFnDLf3edh_lajTwVwka9M-PYVJipjcfyOLaZdxWeYtdjbNzlB0IfsXLae0s7jQfzbZOUpOIO8lWE6CE-lfh1F_ujNqF4NG-QcUPmskXtpTC0zNt0CzklUmH66CsNmM-qCvUjum6wVXoh4eNocpFifsPvYHN9E3cuR69Uge3QvWP9Qp1scr8xBL5pphAShwHm-PU45AQZPx9SPEAaduhgWhKbKw6ZRMGAZ1wm4_jSQ.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/A3ven8a/35403
كل ابيض جمــيل 🤍
BY ٱفيۧنۨــہ🕊✨
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
ٱفيۧنۨــہ from us