tg-me.com/yasminat97/29487
Last Update:
BY ياسِميُنات ❀
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/icHmJaiZXAgClyFtaIMTmAbzlPLbv1SOOoru7VVeTy0qipPYjdtjCOXIK5YXYUp9FSgvxLvu3j3rBgMqtPXSOpt3o1ncYU3JfyL6fW9-0BknUBsRivd7m5t9-eosqqBsZMXQqNw0JW2S29JFuPkwSKZV46ajw_GPkDLNKgDXzlhnaC5ZUK_9TN7auTIjb6XKQdjwGOUzDq3kbWO94nR3lMTmLtCPe4Uj08Kqimu0Hd5m_wxuO0I8hCcxyosIGwJ7jHH0gtQ90ne5KIK1h8_oI2pnjVT9jbmYbPGdPrAxQiSca2yNvJx0HibFJcB6zjDtZ7baBEMHesLGTWs3irhm4A.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/yasminat97/29487
BY ياسِميُنات ❀
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
ياسِميُنات from us