全球富豪财富蒸发马斯克跌至3000亿美元 唯巴菲特上涨
全球股市因特朗普的关税大棒暴跌，市值蒸发数万亿美元，股神巴菲特（Warren Buffett）是全球为数不多今年个人财富有所增长的富豪之一。
而全球首富马斯克（Elon Musk）今年来蒸发的财富高达1347亿美元（1819亿新元），并且去年11月来首次跌破3000亿美元。
根据彭博亿万富翁指数，巴菲特今年的净资产增加了115亿美元，达到1535亿美元。不过他的净资产达到五年来的最高水平后，自4月2日以来下降了145亿美元。
...
#财经即时 #富豪 #亿万富豪 #关税 #特朗普 #巴菲特 #马斯克
BY 联合早报 即时报道
In general, many financial experts support their clients’ desire to buy cryptocurrency, but they don’t recommend it unless clients express interest. “The biggest concern for us is if someone wants to invest in crypto and the investment they choose doesn’t do well, and then all of a sudden they can’t send their kids to college,” says Ian Harvey, a certified financial planner (CFP) in New York City. “Then it wasn’t worth the risk.” The speculative nature of cryptocurrency leads some planners to recommend it for clients’ “side” investments. “Some call it a Vegas account,” says Scott Hammel, a CFP in Dallas. “Let’s keep this away from our real long-term perspective, make sure it doesn’t become too large a portion of your portfolio.” In a very real sense, Bitcoin is like a single stock, and advisors wouldn’t recommend putting a sizable part of your portfolio into any one company. At most, planners suggest putting no more than 1% to 10% into Bitcoin if you’re passionate about it. “If it was one stock, you would never allocate any significant portion of your portfolio to it,” Hammel says.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
联合早报 即时报道 from us