tg-me.com/misGatosyYo/2283
Last Update:
BY I, cat - Gatos y más gatos
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn1.cdn-telegram.org/file/Z_S8b0M8ixJW8o8KxwGOfJcbRSlu4Y8VSQcoYsW_39sdnMLm1f-hcXFZBTfW1kP0I6oVQrrSgUD18whgq-uNLcvRmZDsi5SILgINJPJGubNwrOjSBg4fjZuNlJ15Lx4WV_WdjVD4UpmmjZo0n05nQgFOldpwjnosz_r6z3GK7j-fQw4E0NvIuhHEGbDD8V1YF5ociLH8L3oaX2VLllZ0ymLlvLThDK1583TZNsOl0IaOW1EwBDLLwsqvUGZSy9mw6Q6d6vfl3iBRq-LDRZYsDW6iUq8Q0N_lWyGmlJjSUxYEtdA0ntV_Lc1AfJQmeUNuDw9DLeX7ZKCzjghBNcxvQg.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/misGatosyYo/2283
BY I, cat - Gatos y más gatos
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
telegram from de