tg-me.com/ISXl5/36334
Last Update:
πΦΉ.
BY π² π πΎπ π πΎ ππ πΊπΌπΎ .
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn1.cdn-telegram.org/file/mKFjGLNLtI2NzXL-KUjxEg8gzh1SdsUmxVQFxDAzT_i8YeWAxD81UfvFqZqcLEd-vXUB3GkLfAHkbMASEqHljZjRS4B3GnT4qWfpzIurSn-LyjKc-XbKnEyNe48LOQcE3dLqcPKYviahQ0XMf3pOhTivgs6Qq3AaB0Y3dl434aWn7Y_rD0jQLxEGvzw_X7LaMdA306CaKVjX2fz-A7J9MRbLCJ6pMAlDVXKdbrrt6ACR-iKXF2uqCIqjFZJCua0-K36v3GDvGP58tR8LSAI0PzEeui_TNTothCnfsfFzgPyalTGJxdhAD2ThiccJpkoscO4stBFfuimzzGamunicdg.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/ISXl5/36334
πΦΉ.
BY π² π πΎπ π πΎ ππ πΊπΌπΎ .
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
telegram from br