tg-me.com/cholaka_com/6369
Last Update:
BY ــچۆلەڪە بێ باڵەڪانـــ
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/lAUcLZasRjqaJKxUHsvZ3OpLbNSpW_ADyy67IHZUVRTzwnml3M5rYBctTCtl0aqTP-4I5fZ35rCT0SnJ7D-KgMBpre8D3aC9jJvApI_ll1BbVWuqHYpw3L8D-XEyvbOPVQ-6pQJcL6bCeqMGJWm031kLN9eWqTzFgcNXlRMf7YD0E-x-uLTpdN_mMJPfi1Ye268IodLcn533zFIlYB6ggKghA3b8bKS-86Zfdh4KkB36N015rcwfzkepNX9vy9dZH1Hi5GyAOFACmxid2lXIf31HlF1ak0ETr8M3qERIx1AGcpOB0DbynYM75u4ol_n_WzH16nxKQUSHTayr-ZOrpg.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/cholaka_com/6369
BY ــچۆلەڪە بێ باڵەڪانـــ
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
ــچۆلەڪەبێباڵەڪانـــ from ar